Generation ship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Stanford Torus-based generation ship, proposed by Project Hyperion[1]

A generation ship, or generation starship, is a hypothetical type of interstellar ark starship that travels at sub-light speed.

Since such a ship might take centuries to thousands of years to reach even nearby stars, the original occupants of a generation ship would grow old and die, leaving their descendants to continue traveling.


Rocket pioneer Robert H. Goddard was the first to write about long-duration interstellar journeys in his "The Ultimate Migration" (1918).[2] In this he described the death of the Sun and the necessity of an "interstellar ark". The crew would travel for centuries in suspended animation and be awakened when they reached another star system.

Konstantin E. Tsiolkovsky, father of astronautic theory, first described the need for multiple generations of passengers in his essay, "The Future of Earth and Mankind" (1928), a space colony equipped with engines that travels thousands of years which he called "Noah's Ark".

Another early description of a generation ship is in the 1929 essay "The World, The Flesh, & The Devil" by J. D. Bernal.[3] Bernal's essay was the first publication to reach the public and influence other writers. He wrote about the concept of human evolution and mankind's future in space through methods of living that we now describe as a generation starship, and which could be seen in the generic word "globes".[3]


According to Hein et al., a "generation ship" is a spacecraft on which a crew is living on-board for at least several decades, such that it comprises multiple generations.[4] Several sub-categories of generation ships are distinguished: sprinter, slow boat, colony ship, world ship.[4] The Enzmann starship is categorised as "slow boat" because of the Astronomy Magazine title “Slow Boat to Centauri” (1977).[5] Gregory Matloff's concept is called a "colony ship" and Alan Bond called his concept a "world ship".[6] These definitions are essentially based on the velocity of the ship and population size.[7]



Such a ship would have to be entirely self-sustaining, providing energy, food, air, and water for everyone on board. It must also have extraordinarily reliable systems that could be maintained by the ship's inhabitants over long periods of time. This would require testing whether thousands of humans could survive on their own before sending them beyond the reach of help. Small artificial closed ecosystems, such as the Biosphere 2, have been built in an attempt to work out the engineering difficulties in such a system, with mixed results.[8]

Biology and society[edit]

Generation ships would have to anticipate possible biological, social and morale problems,[9] and would also need to deal with matters of self-worth and purpose for the various crews involved.

Estimates of the minimum reasonable population for a generation ship vary. Anthropologist John Moore has estimated that, even in the absence of cryonics or sperm banks, a population capacity of 160 people would allow normal family life (with the average individual having ten potential marriage partners) throughout a 200-year space journey, with little loss of genetic diversity; social engineering can reduce this estimate to 80 people.[10] In 2013 anthropologist Cameron Smith reviewed existing literature and created a new computer model to estimate a minimum reasonable population in the tens of thousands. Smith's numbers were much larger than previous estimates such as Moore's, in part because Smith takes the risk of accidents and disease into consideration, and assumes at least one severe population catastrophe over the course of a 150-year journey.[11]

In light of the multiple generations that it could take to reach even our nearest neighboring star systems such as Proxima Centauri, further issues on the viability of such interstellar arks include:

  • the possibility of humans dramatically evolving in directions unacceptable to the sponsors
  • the minimum population required to maintain in isolation a culture acceptable to the sponsors; this could include such aspects as
    • ability to maintain and operate the ship
    • ability to accomplish the purpose (planetary colonization, research, building new interstellar arks) contemplated
    • sharing the values of the sponsors, which may not be likely to be empirically demonstrated to be viable beyond the home planet unless, once the ship is away from Earth and on its way, survival of one's offspring until the ship reaches the target star is one motivation.


In order for a spacecraft to maintain a stable environment for multiple generations, it would have to be large enough to support a community of humans and a fully recycling ecosystem.[12] However, a spacecraft of such a size would require a lot of energy to accelerate and decelerate. A smaller spacecraft, while able to accelerate more easily and thus make higher cruise velocities more practical, would reduce exposure to cosmic radiation and the time for malfunctions to develop in the craft, but would have challenges with resource metabolic flow and ecologic balance.[13]

Social breakdown[edit]

Generation ships travelling for long periods of time may see breakdowns in social structures. Changes in society (for example, mutiny) could occur over such periods and may prevent the ship from reaching its destination. This state was described by Algis Budrys in a 1966 book review:[14]

The slower-than-light interstellar spaceship, pursuing its way through the weary centuries, its crew losing touch with all reality save the interior of the vessel ... Well, you know the story, and its unhappy downhill round, its exciting struggles between the barbarian tribes which develop in its disparate compartments, and then, if the writer is so minded, the ultimate flash of hope as the good guys win out and prepare to meet their future on some noble, if erroneous basis.

Robert A. Heinlein's Orphans of the Sky (the "impeccable statement of this theme", Budrys said)[14] and Brian Aldiss's Non-Stop (U.S. title: Starship) discussed such societies.

Cosmic rays[edit]

The radiation environment of deep space is very different from that on the Earth's surface, or in low earth orbit, due to the much larger influx of high-energy galactic cosmic rays (GCRs). Like other ionizing radiation, high-energy cosmic rays can damage DNA and increase the risk of cancer, cataracts, and neurological disorders.[15] One known practical solution to this problem is surrounding the crewed parts of the ship with a thick enough shielding such as a thick layer of maintained ice as proposed in The Songs of Distant Earth, a science fiction novel by Arthur C. Clarke (note: in this book the ship's mammoth ice shield is only in the forward part of the ship, preventing micrometeors from damaging the ship during its interstellar journey).

Ethical considerations[edit]

The success of a generation ship depends on children born aboard taking over the necessary duties, as well as having children themselves. Even if their quality of life might be better than, for example, that of people born into poverty on Earth, philosophy professor Neil Levy has raised the question of whether it is ethical to severely constrain life choices of individuals by locking them into a project they did not choose.[16] A moral quandary exists regarding how intermediate generations, those destined to be born and die in transit without actually seeing tangible results of their efforts, might feel about their forced existence on such a ship.

Project Hyperion[edit]

Project Hyperion, launched in December 2011 by Icarus Interstellar, was to perform a preliminary study that defines integrated concepts for a crewed interstellar generation ship. This was a two-year study mainly based out of the WARR student group at the Technical University of Munich (TUM). The study aimed to provide an assessment of the feasibility of crewed interstellar flight using current and near-future technologies. It also aimed to guide future research and technology development plans as well as to inform the public about crewed interstellar travel.[17][18] Notable results of the project include an assessment of world ship system architectures and adequate population size.[4][19] The core team members have transferred to the Initiative for Interstellar Studies's world ship project and a survey paper on generation ships has been presented at the ESA Interstellar Workshop in 2019 as well as in ESA's Acta Futura journal.[20][21][22]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Hein, Andreas M.; Pak, Mikhail; Pütz, Daniel; Bühler, Christian; Reiss, Philipp (2012). "World ships—architectures & feasibility revisited". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 65 (4): 119.
  2. ^ Simone Caroti (2011). The Generation Starship in Science Fiction: A Critical History, 1934-2001. McFarland. p. 275. ISBN 978-0-7864-6067-0.
  3. ^ a b J. D. Bernal. "The World, the Flesh & the Devil - An Enquiry into the Future of the Three Enemies of the Rational Soul". Retrieved 20 January 2016.
  4. ^ a b c Hein, Andreas M.; Pak, Mikhail; Pütz, Daniel; Bühler, Christian; Reiss, Philipp (2012). "World ships—architectures & feasibility revisited". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 65 (4): 119.
  5. ^ K.F.Long, A.Crowl, R.Obousy. "The Enzmann Starship: History & Engineering Appraisal" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 January 2013. Retrieved 7 February 2013.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ Hein, Andreas; et al. "World Ships – Architectures & Feasibility Revisited". Retrieved 7 February 2013. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  7. ^ Hein, A.M.; Smith, C.; Marin, F.; Staats, K. (2020). "World Ships: Feasibility and Rationale". Acta Futura. 12: 75–104. arXiv:2005.04100. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3747333.
  8. ^ Merchant, Brian (June 10, 2013). "Biosphere 2: How a Sci-Fi Stunt Turned Into the World's Biggest Earth Science Lab". Motherboard. Vice Media LLC. Archived from the original on August 19, 2016.
  9. ^ Malik, Tariq (27 January 2005). "Sex and Society Aboard the First Starships". Space Adventures. Retrieved 13 February 2015. [Original reference is dead link Archived 2002-04-07 at the Wayback Machine:, 19 March 2002.]
  10. ^ Damian Carrington (15 February 2002). ""Magic number" for space pioneers calculated". New Scientist. Retrieved 6 August 2019.
  11. ^ Smith, Cameron M. (2013-12-13). "Smith, C.M., "Estimation of a genetically viable population for multigenerational interstellar voyaging: Review and data for project Hyperion"". Acta Astronautica. 97: 16–29. Bibcode:2014AcAau..97...16S. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.12.013.
  12. ^ Computing the minimal crew for a multi-generational space travel towards Proxima Centauri b
  13. ^ Kim Stanley Robinson (January 13, 2016). "What Will It Take for Humans to Colonize the Milky Way?". Scientific American. Retrieved January 31, 2019.
  14. ^ a b Budrys, Algis (August 1966). "Galaxy Bookshelf". Galaxy Science Fiction. pp. 186–194.
  15. ^ "NASA Facts: Understanding Space Radiation" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2004-10-30. Retrieved 2010-04-01.
  16. ^ Levy, Neil (13 June 2016). "Would it be immoral to send out a generation starship?". Aeon. Retrieved 26 June 2019.
  17. ^ Interstellar, Icarus (2020-12-06). "Icarus Interstellar, Interstellar flight". Icarus Interstellar. Retrieved 2020-12-07.
  18. ^ DNews. "Icarus Interstellar: Visions of Our Starship Future". Seeker. Retrieved 2020-12-07.
  19. ^ Smith, Cameron M. (2014). "Estimation of a genetically viable population for multigenerational interstellar voyaging: Review and data for project Hyperion". Acta Astronautica. 97: 16-29. Bibcode:2014AcAau..97...16S. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.12.013.
  20. ^ Hein, Andreas M; Smith, Cameron; Marin, Frederic; Staats, Kai (2020). "World Ships: Feasibility and Rationale" (PDF). Acta Futura. 12: 75-104. arXiv:2005.04100. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3747333.[dead link]
  21. ^ Faife, Corin (17 December 2019). "Scientists Are Contemplating a 1,000-Year Space Mission to Save Humanity". Medium - OneZero. Retrieved 14 February 2021.
  22. ^ Hein, Andreas M; Smith, Cameron; Marin, Frédéric; Staats, Kai. "World Ships –Feasibility and Rationale" (PDF). Retrieved 16 February 2021.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]